patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

'Fracking' the Focus of Oakland County Town Hall

Approximately 100 turned out to hear from activists, elected officials, and industry experts on the controversial issue involving natural gas underneath area waterways.

 

PONTIAC — Three hundred, twenty-two thousand, six hundred and nine.

Activist LuAnne Kozma won't deny that it's a lot of signatures required to get her favored proposal for a statewide ban on hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking," on the Nov. 2014 ballot, but after a special town hall meeting on the subject, she feels optimistic.

"I don't think we can rely on the current state government, or frankly, the future government to do this. It's a power that we, the people, have, and we need to do this for ourselves and future generations," said Kozma, the campaign director of the Committee to Ban Fracking in Michigan.

Approximately 100 turned out to the Oakland County Commissioners Auditorium Wednesday night to learn more on the subject and to network with others in the crowd, the vast majority of whom who seemed to be strongly against the controversial practice of collecting natural gas from underwater sources, currently taking place in several counties in Michigan.

According to organizers and county commissioners Jim Nash (D-Farmington Hills), a candidate for Water Resources Commissioner in the Nov. 6 election and Craig Covey (D-Ferndale), the process of fracking involves using a high-pressure mixture of water, sand and chemicals to break apart energy-rich rocks.

Erik Bauss, of the Michigan Oil and Gas Association, said that he frequently works with the energy industry and state regulators to safely drill in order to take advantage of home-grown resources. However, in Kozma's view and the view of many in attendance, the industry is in bed with state legislators, blind to local concerns.  

"Our state regulators pretty much repeat industry talking points. They say, 'We have no plans for this county,' but they really do. It's actually surprising to me that it's an issue here, because of the high population. I'm hoping county residents will use this to make others in the state aware of what's happening," said Kozma, a Charlevoix resident.

The issue became local in large part after a state mineral rights auction in May during which Jordan Development of Traverse City purchased much of the available 18,347 acres in Oakland County. West Bloomfield resident Kathy Chiaravalli, who attended that auction as well as the meeting in May, pointed out that rights to land were being sold for as low as $12 an acre.

"In Michigan, there’s absolutely no relationship between the starting bid of the land and the potential economic benefit. No relationship between the starting bid of the land and the potential impact. It could be on a lake with many people," Chiaravalli said Wednesday during public comment.

Chiaravalli successfully lobbied officials in her township to pass a resolution banning oil and gas drilling. However, Kozma pointed out, that may not be enough to protect the entirety of Oakland County from potential harm.

"Locally, local community after local community can band together, but at the end of the day it still sets up a situation in which some communities are protected while others are not," she said.

Related Topics: Craig Covey, Jim Nash, Oakland County Commission, fracking, and fracking protest
Where do you stand on the issue of "fracking"? Tell us in the comments.

Theresa Erickson

9:26 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

It's like a nightmare that fracking has come to Michigan. One need only look at Pennsylvania, New York, Arkansas and other states that have allowed fracking to see the horrific contamination of drinking water and the resulting health problems. Even folks only concerned about the economy should realize that the presence of cancer-causing chemicals like benzene in drinking water sends property values and the economy down the toilet permanently. This time the nimby folks are out of luck, since virtually all of Michigan's groundwater is connected and Oakland county feeds 5 major rivers. It will affect everyone--the rich, the poor, the young, the old and those of future generations. It's like they say: "You can't put toothpaste back in the tube." Since only 20% of the toxic chemical-filled water used in fracking is recovered, what happens to the remaining 80% once it's in the maze of underground fissures that connect our groundwater? Too bad only 3 of our 25 county commissioners cared enough to show up last night for the informative town hall meeting--and two of them sponsored the event. Those not in attendance have made our choice clear. I guess it's time to vote in commissioners who care about citizens and not campaign contributions from oil and gas companies!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ferndale_1986

11:34 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

typical Covey grandstanding on an issue that is not county business.

hate on the oil and gas companies, but why don't you walk to work and heat your home with wood? do that and then lecture us.

Comment_arrow

Mike Plaskey

10:39 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Before you all say "no" please do all your home work about fracking... How deep is the ground water?...how deep is the Gas to be recovered?..how are wells constructed and what are the measures to protect the water...is it really true about "all" the water contamination...do your home work!!...The industry fracks all over this country without any issues..and many of those places have LOTS OF JOBS!!!!.

Comment_arrow

Lianne Mathie

11:00 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Mike , one word, Enbridge. Please do YOUR homework. Ask how the people in Kalamazoo are doing. Yes, it was Canadian crude.
That being said, what are these companies going to do if they pollute the ground water? walk away with a small fine?, that doesn't restore the environment?
We live on a peninsula where the water table is high in some areas, you have the burden of proof, not the other way around.

Comment_arrow

M Kerby

12:14 pm on Friday, September 14, 2012

I agree Mike there are alot of jobs that are created with this technology and it would be great to pump up the coffers for everyone here in Michigan! That said, I do think the state and it's very unique and most important natural resource = Fresh Water should be considered above all else.The Great Lakes hold 20% of the world's fresh water supply and 80% of the U.S. supply. When looking at the supply as a "Faucet" of fresh water for the global population's needs in the future - It makes no logical sense to intoduce this new technology and possible unknown health concerns right at the source. It would seem to make sense that this would be the absolute last place mankind would want to take that chance! There are good deposits like Michigan's elsewhere. We are currently fracking in many other places so lets take some time to fine tune the process and study it before possibly poisoning the well.

Comment_arrow

Lowell Todd Armstrong

12:34 pm on Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Theresa:
You do know do you not that there are already thousands of wells that have already been fraced in Michigan. The practice of Hydraulic Fracture Stimulation (Fracing) of wells has been used through out Michigan since the mid 1950's. Most of these frac jobs have been done one vertical wells, but the fracing process is the the exact same, for both vertical and horizontal wells. So far there has been no harm to water supplies, nor have property values declined at any time in the last 60 years because of this technique.

Strangely, most of the people that live in the areas that have been drilled in Pennsylvania,and Ohio are perfectly content with the results of the drilling. (We have two family farms in Ohio that had wells drilled and fraced on them in the 1970's, we have NEVER HAD A PROBLEM with the wells). The Only people that are making noise in Pennsylvania,and Ohio are those that do not have any mineral interest or are renting and are not getting any benefit from the drilling. The obvious solution is get a lawyer and sue so you can get paid.

Comment_arrow

Lianne Mathie

4:48 pm on Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Hey Lowell,
Why not preface your comments with who you are?
http://gomarcellusshale.com/profile/LowellToddArmstrong
Drink a big old glass of benzine and get back to me with how you feel after.

Comment_arrow

Lowell Todd Armstrong

12:29 pm on Thursday, March 14, 2013

Lianne:
Who I am (Part 3)

My only interest in the GoMarcellus.com website is in my family's Farm Acreage in Ohio for the Utica Shale drilling (note that most of my posts are in the Geauga County, Ohio Group). And to watch the ignorance on display, by those who know nothing about basic Geology, Rock Mechanics or Fluid Mechanics. The simple physical truth is that you could hook up every power plant in the US together, and you could still not get a hydraulic fracture to grow the the 5000' that it would require to break from the gas saturated zones that we are targeting into the drinking water aquifers. IT SIMPLY REQUIRES TO MUCH HORSEPOWER.

SO that is who I am. Do you have anymore questions?

Comment_arrow

Lowell Todd Armstrong

12:31 pm on Thursday, March 14, 2013

Lianne:

Who I am (Part 2)

I live in Texas because that is were my work is, but I remain a Midwestern at heart. It has always been my intend to retire on to one of the farms in Ohio. The big cash crop in that part of Ohio is Maple Syrup, Both farms have big Sugar Bushes (A woods made up of sugar maples). My cousin's farm (My dad's farm) is now completely rigged so he runs his evaporator from the free natural gas he gets off the fraced gas wells. He does not have to cut and split all the cords of wood that we used to have to do so it is pretty much a one man operation. Also the royalty's off the gas production have helped pay the taxes on the farm when it was a bad year for sugaring.

I have drilled thousands of wells for various companies since I have been in the exploration business, we have fraced about a third of those wells. We have neve had a problem with any of them. I have never drilled a well in Michigan, but several of my buddies from Tech stayed and work in Michigan and I know from them that a much higher percentage of wells in Michigan are fraced than are those that were drilled on the Gulf Coast.

(to be continued)

Comment_arrow

Lowell Todd Armstrong

12:31 pm on Thursday, March 14, 2013

Lianne:
If you would like to know who I am, I will be happy to bore you my background (Part 1)

I grew up in Waterford (Waterford Mott 1975). Both my parents were farm kids from Ohio, my Dads family farm has been in our family for almost two hundred year. But my Dad was the Youngest son in a family that the farm goes to the Oldest son (the only way to keep a farm together). So after WWII he got a suitcase a handshake. My Mom still owns her family farm along with my aunt . Even though my brothers and sisters grew up in Michigan we spent a lot of time on the farms down in Ohio.

In the 1970's My Uncle's Farm (My Dads Family Farm), and my Grandfather's Farm (My Mom's Farm) both had Clinton Sand Gas Wells drilled on them. All of these wells were FRACED. This process of drilling wells interested me so after high school I went to Michigan Tech and got a degree in Geological Engineering (1980).

I was hired on by Tenneco Oil out of school down in Houston, and have lived Texas and worked in the Oil and Gas Exploration business ever since. However, I return to Michigan and Ohio several times ever year. My family still all lives in Michigan. My Mom still lives in the same house that myself and my six siblings grew up in. I have a brother and sister who live in Bloomfield, I saw this article because my sister sent it to me.
(To be Continued)

Comment_arrow

Lianne Mathie

1:32 pm on Thursday, March 14, 2013

Lowell,
I know for a fact that fracking is done in Michigan. However, when energy companies make mistakes, they have a very poor track record of making ammends to the people and enviroments they hurt. Enbridge, BP, Shell etc.
While you make think we are all rubes because we didn't get a degree in geology, we understand the the Great Lakes is one of the ONLY sources of fresh water on the planet. If you were the sole owner of all these natural resources then you could do what ever you pleased. I can question the millions of gallons of toxic chemcals that are pumped into the ground to extract gas and ask, where do they go? Why is so much fresh water being used in the fracking process? because in Michigan we don't have salt water, the fracking must use millions of gallons of fresh water.
When Nestle NA decided to bottle warter n the west side of the state, they claimed that it would have no ill effects, yet, people wells stared drying up.
I constantly hear promises of how there will be no ill effects, yet when the worst case scenerio occurs, the responsible parties lawyer up and it's the residents who cannot afford high end attorneys that suffer.

Comment_arrow

Marjorie Findley

12:49 pm on Friday, March 22, 2013

The amount of water needed to frack is disgustingly higher than initially thought.
To frack just ONE well requires from 5 - 21 million gallons of fresh water, which then becomes permanently destroyed/poisoned with chemicals. The recovered contaminated 'slippery' water can NEVER be returned to ground water aquifers, so it is 'stored' in underground injection wells. Remember the 2010 Marshall MI spill ? -- which is still not cleaned up -- by Enbridge, the company with >800 spills in the last decade. How long before we DISCOVER the mistakes (spills, leaks) with water ?
Still not convinced ? Get loads of extensively documented information, complete with resources, at; www.BanMichiganFracking.org
If you do understand the issue, and KNOW it must be banned in Michigan, see --
www.Letsbanfracking.org. ........ This is a ballot initiative petition drive; obtaining signatures begins 4/12/13; after kick-off events around the State, eg; FERNDALE Library 4/6/13

Comment_arrow

Motown Voice

11:04 am on Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Hey, Ferndale 1986: I do. Walk to work. And heat with wood. Both. And I agree with Theresa.

And your generalizing using someone's name as if its some kind of insult is juvenile and cheapens your point.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Timothy Rath

10:42 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Kat: Information on LuAnne Kozma's organization can be found at http://letsbanfracking.org.

Lynn Vander Meer

3:48 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

One of the most valuable resources Michigan has is its clean water. Let's keep it that way.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cheryl Loukinen

5:44 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

I agree, our lakes are very valuable. They are having the same kind of fight in the upper peninsula. One article is saying a mining company wants to take 150,000 gallons of water from Lake Superior and put the watsewater back into creeks that will lead back into our lakes. Clean water in our state needs protection.

Comment_arrow

Erin

10:20 am on Friday, September 14, 2012

"Pure Michigan" - says it all. It would be an economic disaster if we foul our biggest asset. We can always find/use alternative sources of energy. Not so with water. And the expense of cleaning or storing waste water is prohibitive. Ask California (dealing with their nitrates from farming) or Texas (fracking waste water).

Comment_arrow

Morally Clued-In Indie Chick

11:51 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

To put favor in gas over clean, safe, water is foolish. Lynn, it's a no-brainer to most, but not all will understand this oh-so-basic-truth! After all, some will be left behind. Unfortunate for them!

Barbara rosalik

4:17 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

NO FRACKING WAY!!!! You can't clean ground water. Clean water is life and it is our responsibility to keep it clean.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Theresa Erickson

12:42 am on Friday, September 14, 2012

Well, Ferndale, if you feel that clean drinking water isn't county business, then why do we have an Oakland County Water Resources Commissioner? By the way, he wasn't at the meeting last night either--despite the fact that he is up for re-election.
Sorry, if you felt lectured instead of educated by my comments. I found your comment kinda funny since my husband has biked to work for over 20 years--yes, including winters. My son does also, having chosen energy efficiency over owning a car. I probably would consider it myself if I didn't need to carry a trunk load of tools with me for my job. As for heating with wood, I'm not sure our building code allows wood furnaces, but my brother and cousin who live further north love theirs. I hope you are right and the oil and gas industries will protect our water, our health and our economy, but I'm not willing to bet my family's future on it.

Comment_arrow

Patricia Kane

9:42 am on Friday, September 14, 2012

If everyone practiced a little better conservation and didn't waste so much, and if we all became better stewards of our natural resources, we would be in a lot better shape. The truth is we are using up our natural resources at an accelerated rate with no signs of curtailing the waste. I agree with Lynn, Barb, Cheryl and many others on this issue. We have a lot to loose and much to protect.

Suzanne J

8:45 am on Friday, September 14, 2012

Well said, Theresa!
Once the water is poisoned, that's it...then where do you go? Along with clean air, it is the most vital resource on this earth and drinkable water is actually very rare. I can go a week without gasoline, lights or a TV. And I can train for another job. Can you go a week without water? At that point, which one is more vital becomes absolutely clear.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Erin

12:41 pm on Friday, September 14, 2012

Not to mention the risks and potential costs of healthcare if we are all drinking - who knows what.

Right now, there is NO federal oversight of fracking because Cheney and industry friends literally wrote the legislation carefully sheilding fracking from oversight. Also, companies are claiming they must protect "proprietary information", that is, their "recipes" for their fracking fluid. Currently, there are NO disclosure requirements.

I think we also know how little $ strapped states have to handle such a complicated and expensive undertaking of trying to regulate at the state level, which means functionally, NO oversight.

At the behest of Conservative industry leaders and industry auditors alike, the Obama administration is trying to pass some basic safety standards at least on federal lands. Industry grandfather George Mitchell "The administration is trying to tighten up controls, I think It’s a good idea. They should have very strict controls. " Warning particularly: "The smaller independent drillers are wild" http://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherhelman/2012/07/19/billionaire-father-of-fracking-says-government-must-step-up-regulation/
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/03/24/auditors-say-federal-officials-need-to-step-up-oversight-on-gas-lines-tied-to/

All these risks should be factored in the REAL costs of this energy source.

Scott Hammer

12:36 pm on Friday, September 14, 2012

The burning questions in my mind are:

Where do they get the water that they would inject into the fracking wells?
How much water is required?
Does it have a net effect of reducing the amount of easily extractable fresh water near the surface?
How long does it take the water deeply injected into the earth to rise back toward the surface as fresh water?
Is there any chance the fracking water can introduce contaminants into the fresh water supply?

Until we have clear answers and assurances that the amount and nature of our fresh water can be preserved, I have to vote no.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Erin

12:57 pm on Friday, September 14, 2012

Scott -

The average estimate is 2-5 million gal/per site. For example, Pennsylvania uses about 10 million gallons of water per day for Marcellus Shale drilling.

The water in most US sites come from the same aquafir as residents drinking water. Essentially, the same "well" underground.
"Does it have a net effect of reducing the amount of easily extractable fresh water near the surface? " Yes, having big problems in Texas exacerbated by drought, difficulty in maintianing water pressure in many residential areas.
"How long does it take the water deeply injected into the earth to rise back toward the surface as fresh water? " No one knows.
Contaminants? Yup. Although it's difficult to determine extent since we don't even know what chemicals to test for, since there's no disclosure.

Then there's the earthquakes. Seismic events related to energy development have been measured in 13 US states, also in U.K.
This article is a pretty good overview of some of the proven issues and problems.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-23/drought-helps-fracking-foes-build-momentum-for-recycling.html

Ferndale_1986

1:04 pm on Friday, September 14, 2012

@Theresa Erickson

you live like that and good for you, but you live like 0.000001% of the population. the rest of the real world wants cars and central heating and air conditioning and a hot water heater and the same in their workplace. a modern civilization and transportation network and a high standard of living requires energy and lots of it.
you are living in a fantasy world.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Erin

1:34 pm on Friday, September 14, 2012

Ferndale - the fantasy is thinking that a completely unregulated "goldrush" with a technology involving much risk will not involve short cuts and invite environmental and financial disaster at some point.

The fantasy is to think we can live easily and without risk by putting all of our eggs in one basket (fossil fuels).

Our energy policy should be like our financial portfolio - diversified to spread risk. It's hubris to do otherwise.

Comment_arrow

Morally Clued-In Indie Chick

12:28 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Ah, but to convey a heaping amount of common sense, Erin! Right on!

Erin

1:23 pm on Friday, September 14, 2012

Also, the safeguards are WHOLLY based on the CEMENT seals. Yes, the same cement seals used at the BP oil disaster. Through the BP investigation, we've discovered that the industry has been trying to work through cement chemistry problems.
http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/News/2010/September/10091001.asp

Combine potentially unstable cement chemical composition, with an increased risk of seismic activity associated with fracking, and i'd say you have a recipe for dangerous, expensive, long term problems - for which there are NO back up plans, and none required.

Another good discussion on Forbes.com: "Cementing is not easy and it takes some time and some money. Not much compared to the drilling itself or to the value of the oil or gas obtained, but still significant. And for that reason, the cement job is susceptible to the same boneheaded decisions that are made to save a buck but end up losing billions. This is an ideal situation for strong regulations. Unfortunately, the CEMENT job is NOT REGULATED, NOT EVEN the CEMENT COMPOSITION."

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2012/09/10/the-fracking-solution-is-a-good-cement-job/

Reply
Comment_arrow

Morally Clued-In Indie Chick

12:28 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Makes it all too easy for the industry to play the blame game, doesn't it?!

Haulin T Male

8:59 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012

We need jobs so by all means lets jump on the first wagon coming down the road, wth, calm down. Think, twice, in MICHIGAN all our water sooner or later ends up in the G Lakes. Out on Lake Orion, a developer wanted more lake shore, he dug lagoons not deep, and a lake close by started to disappear, it turned into a grassy wet land. Out area is fragile, very fragile, and Mother nature has it working pretty good, let no man set it aside, find your salvation (jobs) destroying some thing else. I don't need to heat my house with wood, cause you say so, pellets are better. sooner or later man will find out that the world can be run by "wind" as per the discovery / scien chan. not just wind but current, under the water surface.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Morally Clued-In Indie Chick

11:41 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Agreed, Haulin! Greed. Let's teach our kids by showing them movies in elementary school, about the importance of fracking! Ahem, this is exactly what was shown in my child's classroom just yesterday! My child knows far more about fracking than the toddler-style presentation that was given, and could have stood up and given the facts to the entire classroom! Let's teach our kids the truth, let's be real, because the schools and the industry appear to have just the opposite planned.

Haulin T Male

9:06 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012

The national News just last week had a pc. on an area in Texas, that was all for the pipe line and Fract'g. until this study came out, Texas has very little to no Earth quake related,or seismic events (not great) enough to say why? The fracturing in that area, (none other close by) has now had like 12 seismic movements, closer to the surface then normal seismic events take place........... guess what the conclusion was, the area is now totally against any more........... the teck. is ahead of Common sense, and Knowledge.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Morally Clued-In Indie Chick

11:34 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

There was recently a scientist from the usgs that acknoweldged a plausible link between fracking and 'seismic movements'. I encourage you to check out google earth, and locate recent earthquakes. As you zoom in, you just may find frack sites within a couple miles from the seismic area. Try it out and see for yourself..

Erin

3:51 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012

It keeps getting more interesting - THIS WEEK:

Odessa, TX
On September 11, Halliburton (yes, THOSE drilling/cement/military contractor guys) "lost" a radioactive device containing americium 241/berillium that's used in locating potential fracking sites.

"Halliburton told the state that workers discovered on Sept. 11 that a lock on the container used to transport the device was missing, along with the unit, after driving a truck to a well south of Odessa from from a site near Pecos, according to the NRC report"

Great. More dangers revealed in this unregulated industry.

And given all that's happened this week abroad, I don't appreciate hearing that even the biggest of industry vendors are sloppy about security with radioactive materials. Especially on 9/11!

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-13/halliburton-hunting-for-missing-radioactive-probe-in-west-texas.html

Reply
Comment_arrow

Morally Clued-In Indie Chick

11:28 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Thank you, Erin for enlightening the opposers to the drive to ban fracking in michigan. A radioactive booboo in TX? Nice! Just another necessary casualty, right? All for the UBER important natural fuel rush. (eh, who needs water. just feed em fuel, that'll suffice, after all, there'll be plenty of that to go around. Health? eh, that's for the birds too.)

Comment_arrow

Erin

12:24 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Morally -

FYI - The latest on Halliburton's fracking related radioactive 'Oooops' in Texas on September 11th.
They've just called in the National Guard to help with week two of their search. Makes me a little nervous at the escalating level of concern. But hey, who wants "job killing" regulation of this industry?

http://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/Energy-Voices/2012/0918/National-Guard-aids-Halliburton-in-search-for-missing-radioactive-rod

Erin

12:05 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Morally -

I'm not necessarily a "tree-hugger" or anything. I just see fracking industry insiders, finance people as well as auditors all chiming in, quite urgently, to get some regulation here.

These folks I quoted earlier in Forbes, Bloomberg articles are not exactly the Sierra Club, and even THEY are saying we need to take care and do things right or it could be economic disaster. (yes, environmental disaster IS economic disaster, loss of jobs and long term liability on a balance sheet)

Smart regulation based on science as well as a diversified energy plan, will encourage long term job gain and US energy independence. The short term thinking of "drill, baby, drill" with no long term plan or thought of risk aversion is, as I said before, hubris.

Reply

Morally Clued-In Indie Chick

12:46 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

This fracking MI effort started 2 years ago, little did I know at the time. 2 years ago I saw the doc GasLand. I foolishly thought this would NEVER come to our aquatic-rich Michigan. Well, I was wrong, wrong, wrong. I could shout from the rooftops about fracking in MI, and almost EVERYONE I have spoken to about fracking has never even heard of it. Yet it's going on in our state! State land being auctioned off for mineral rights! Where's the democratic vote for this? This corporate game of greed is not being played fair. If we live in a democracy, truly, then give us our vote, I say! It really is that simple. And that, Erin, is where we sit at the edge of our seats. Who will ultimately win this game being waged by industry? I, for one, am praying that some moral restructuring happens rather quickly amongst these individuals who are against a democratic vote. What's so wrong with The Committee to Ban Fracking's proposal to amend the constitution? Right? If a person wants to vote "no" in favor of fracking, then fine! Let's just get this initiative on the ballot! My kids even understand this concept! It's elementary, give the people their right to vote yes or no in THEIR State!

Reply

michelle litkouhi

6:38 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013

I attended the meeting re: fracking in West Bloomfield and it was overwhelmingly against fracking for very good reasons which were presented yet why does the Detroit News article online flavor it totally different? Is everybody sleeping with the oil companies? The public needs to be able to make an EDUCATED vote. Points that weren't mentioned at the meeting:

1) My coworkers that drink Detroit water said they don’t drink from a well and don’t have to worry. However, these same people get Michigan produced dairy and poultry products. These animals will be drinking very large amounts of any contaminated well water that occurs. Will the oil companies ship in drinking water for our livestock as they did for humans in PA?

2) Profrackers say there is no alternative. I drive an electric car which I plan to charge with a small wind turbine. My neighbor has been off the grid for years. He has had no issues with his turbine or neighbors or noise, etc.
One profracker said not everyone can have an electric vehicle or turbine. Why not? In the past people thought having a toilet inside your house was a disgusting idea and that air conditioning, refrigeration was frivolous. We went centuries without furnaces. Now, noone thinks of building a house without these. Costs will come down with increased production. My hope is that wind and solar systems will just be normal part of home construction, for my grandchildren’s sake. Smaller homes and families = survival of our race.

Reply

Mark Itall

4:47 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013

Demolish your house, move into the garage.

Reply

Dale Murrish

5:36 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013

Town Hall meetings are a good idea to raise public awareness. Oil and gas industry experts can testify about the safest ways to develop our natural resources, while environmental groups raise concerns about water quality.

Residents can write letters to their state legislators. This issue should ultimately be decided there, with laws modeled after other states, after testimony by experts with data. Not with a citizen petition bypassing the legislature.

Someone tried to get me to sign a petition to ban fracking. I’m an engineer but not an expert on hydraulic fracturing, a specialized topic.

I had never heard of it before reading an article in the Patch; the petition circulator could not explain what it was other than it was potentially bad for the environment. Worse yet, it was not for a new law but a constitutional amendment!

After millions spent by both sides last November and despite a 30 to one ($31M to $800K) spending ratio to preserve Mr. Maroun’s bridge monopoly, all 5 constitutional amendments were solidly defeated.

Michigan needs a ballot proposal to make our constitution more difficult to amend.

It seems to be a new method for getting something done when you don’t have enough votes in the legislature – ask the people for an up-or-down vote on a complex issue with one-sided wording and lock it into the Constitution. No thanks!

http://troy.patch.com/blog_posts/a-guide-to-ballot-proposals-4-5-6

Reply
Comment_arrow

Marjorie Findley

10:59 am on Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Oil and gas industry experts can testify ..... How to make money !! It's not their job or responsibility, to identify the safest way. ( That's the fox telling you, he's taking care of the chickens!) As an engineer, I'm surprised you would believe this. We should ALL do research on this topic, using a variety of resources, not from big oil/gas (or DEQ Hal Fitch, who works with them). Anyone who approves of FRACKING, does not understand it. Do you realize, from 5 million to 21 million gallons of fresh water are permanently chemical-contaminated per each fracked well ? And this destroyed water must NEVER be returned to the water table. This presents two problems; 1) oil companies taking Michigan fresh water (with Great Lake levels at lowest in history) -- for free ! and 2) Storing this frack-contaminated water in underground 'injection wells' forever --- without it escaping to an aquifer. LetsBanFracking.org is a NEW ballot initiative (beginning 4/12/13) which does NOT involve constitutional amendment.

michelle litkouhi

6:54 am on Monday, March 4, 2013

Read National Geographic December 2012 and March 2013. You won't know everything but you might know more than you do at this point it seems :) Keep in mind that just because someone may be an expert on hydraulic fracturing it doesn't mean they are necessarily ethical.

Reply

Haulin T Male

12:19 pm on Friday, April 5, 2013

"PetCoke" The Pictures above were taken over the 4 day period of Easter, What you see is, The piles of Petcoke, from the river, from the gate, you see it piling higher at the curb area, the long street is Fort Street, get away to the down river, aon of the few trucks that were covered, (they were in a hurry, Get er done. I have a ton more, This came from Marathon oil, river rouge (?) stocked plie on the Detroit owned Docks, but leased out in what amounts to 5 or 6 degrees of leases, bottom line The COKE brothers, yes from the political Coke brothers, have the lease, it is being shipped to Nova scotia..... They started during the week , all the way through Easter sunday, 20+ trucks working 24/5, non stop, I tell you they were being paid Big Bucks, (premium pay) they didn't pay any attention to what was being done to the streets, Fort street is also one of the streets the Fans at the wings game are herded to expedite traffic .......... I was shocked to see what was happening , and no one would listen, then all of a sudden, Rep Gary Peters heard ans saw...... so did wjbk......... this lot is on the river , but needs to cross Fort street to get out. as I said if you go to the JOE for any thing most likely you are shown this way out.

Reply

Leave a comment